From Across the Pond – An Unsecured Creditor, Even with Contractual Rights Against the Secured Creditor, Cannot Enforce Common Law Duties on the Manner of Enforcement Against the Collateral
April 6, 2016
Authored by: Ed Marlow
Editor’s Note: Our good London colleague Ed Marlow recently published this as a Bryan Cave client advisory. When we Yanks saw it, we found it fascinating, not only based on the arcane facts, but also to realize that British tribunals struggle with the same things we do here in the States – whether (or how) to protect junior creditors which allege that a secured creditor did not maximize value in disposing of the collateral. Different countries, same insolvency challenges! Our sincere thanks to Ed for this analysis; for a introduction to how Bryan Cave can assist with your corporate trust matters in England, France, Germany, or other EU countries, please click here.
Summary and Holding:
Including an unsecured creditor in an agreed payments waterfall does not by itself confer on that unsecured creditor the benefit of a mortgagee’s usual duties on enforcement